United States v. Sandoval

United States v. Sandoval
Argued February 27, 1913
Decided October 20, 1913
Full case nameUnited States v. Sandoval
Citations231 U.S. 28 (more)
34 S. Ct. 1; 58 L. Ed. 107
Case history
Prior198 F. 539 (D.N.M. 1912)
Holding
Generally applicable federal Indian statutes apply to the Pueblo, which are dependent Indian communities.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Horace H. Lurton
Charles E. Hughes · Willis Van Devanter
Joseph R. Lamar · Mahlon Pitney
Case opinion
MajorityVan Devanter, joined by unanimous

United States v. Sandoval, 231 U.S. 28 (1913), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding whether the federal government's law prohibiting liquor on the land of Santa Clara Pueblo impermissibly infringed on the State of New Mexico's police power under the equal footing doctrine. In a unanimous decision, the Court upheld the law and Congress's ability to recognize and regulate tribes. Citing broad congressional authority in Kagama, recognition of tribes subject to the guardianship of the federal government falls on Congress, not the Court, as long as recognition is not "arbitrary" and actually reflects "distinctly Indian communities." The Supreme Court held the Pueblos to be dependent Indian communities.