United States v. Sandoval
| United States v. Sandoval | |
|---|---|
| Argued February 27, 1913 Decided October 20, 1913 | |
| Full case name | United States v. Sandoval |
| Citations | 231 U.S. 28 (more) 34 S. Ct. 1; 58 L. Ed. 107 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 198 F. 539 (D.N.M. 1912) |
| Holding | |
| Generally applicable federal Indian statutes apply to the Pueblo, which are dependent Indian communities. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Van Devanter, joined by unanimous |
United States v. Sandoval, 231 U.S. 28 (1913), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding whether the federal government's law prohibiting liquor on the land of Santa Clara Pueblo impermissibly infringed on the State of New Mexico's police power under the equal footing doctrine. In a unanimous decision, the Court upheld the law and Congress's ability to recognize and regulate tribes. Citing broad congressional authority in Kagama, recognition of tribes subject to the guardianship of the federal government falls on Congress, not the Court, as long as recognition is not "arbitrary" and actually reflects "distinctly Indian communities." The Supreme Court held the Pueblos to be dependent Indian communities.