NLRB v. Hearst Publications
| NLRB v. Hearst Publications | |
|---|---|
| Argued February 8–9, 1944 Decided April 24, 1944 | |
| Full case name | National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc |
| Citations | 322 U.S. 111 (more) |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Court of Appeals refused to enforce the NLRB's orders, 136 F.2d 608 (reversed). |
| Holding | |
| Reviewing courts have limited review over administrative agencies' interpretation of terms in their organic statutes. The NLRB's finding that the newsboys were employees was subject to deference. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Rutledge, joined by Stone, Black, Frankfurter, Douglas, Murphy, Jackson |
| Concurrence | Reed |
| Dissent | Roberts |
| Laws applied | |
| National Labor Relations Act | |
NLRB v. Hearst Publications, 322 U.S. 111 (1944), was an administrative law case heard before the United States Supreme Court. The case concerned the meaning of the term "employees" in the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).