Lanham Act |
| Other short titles | Trademark Act of 1946 |
|---|
|
| Statutes at Large | 60 Stat. 427 |
|---|
|
| Titles amended | 15 |
|---|
|
|
|
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., 344 U.S. 280 (1952)
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 386 U.S. 714 (1967)
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 456 U.S. 844 (1982)
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc., 469 U.S. 189 (1985)
- San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee, 483 U.S. 522 (1987)
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763 (1992)
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995)
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, 527 U.S. 666 (1999)
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23 (2001)
- Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003)
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003)
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014)
- POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. 102 (2014)
- B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2015)
- Matal v. Tam, No. 15-1293, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)
- Iancu v. Brunetti, No. 18-302, 588 U.S. ___ (2019)
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., No. 18-1233, 590 U.S. ___ (2020)
- Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V., No. 19-46, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)
- Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, No. 22-148, 599 U.S. ___ (2023)
- Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc., No. 21-1043, 600 U.S. ___ (2023)
- Vidal v. Elster, No. 22-704, 602 U.S. ___ (2024)
- Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900, 604 U.S. ___ (2025)
|
The Lanham (Trademark) Act (Pub. L. 79–489, 60 Stat. 427, enacted July 5, 1946, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. (15 U.S.C. ch. 22) is the primary federal statute governing trademark law in the United States.
The Lanham Act establishes a national system of trademark registration and grants owners of federally registered trademarks the right to pursue civil remedies for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, cybersquatting, and false advertising.