Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead
| Goldblatt v. Hempstead | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 15–16, 1962 Decided May 14, 1962 | |
| Full case name | Goldblatt, et al. v. Town of Hempstead |
| Citations | 369 U.S. 590 (more) 82 S. Ct. 987; 8 L. Ed. 2d 130 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Town of Hempstead v. Goldblatt, 19 Misc. 2d 176, 189 N.Y.S.2d 577 (Sup. Ct. 1959); affirmed, 9 A.D.2d 941, 196 N.Y.S.2d 573 (1959); aff'd, 9 N.Y.2d 101, 172 N.E.2d 562 (1961); probable jurisdiction noted, 366 U.S. 942 (1961). |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Clark, joined by unanimous |
| Frankfurter, White took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
Goldblatt v. Hempstead, 369 U.S. 590 (1962), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether a town ordinance regulating a use of a property was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, finding the law in question was constitutional as an exercise of the town's police powers.