2025 Marikina local elections
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Registered | 315,980 21.18 pp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnout | 81.79% 6.13 pp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mayoral election | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vice mayoral election | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City Council election | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 of 18 seats in the Marikina City Council 10 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local elections were held in Marikina on May 12, 2025, as part of the 2025 Philippine general election. The electorate elected a mayor, a vice mayor, sixteen members of the Marikina City Council, and two district representatives to the House of Representatives of the Philippines. The officials elected will assume their respective offices on June 30, 2025, for a three-year term.
Representative Maan Teodoro and former mayor Del de Guzman were elected mayor and vice mayor respectively, defeating their opponents Representative Stella Quimbo and incumbent vice mayor Marion Andres. Teodoro's Team Marikina City under the National Unity Party retained a majority in the city council, but saw their seat share decline. Quimbo's Team Bagong Marikina under Lakas–CMD remained in the minority while gaining three seats. Outgoing mayor Marcelino Teodoro and former Representative Miro Quimbo were elected as the representatives for the first and second districts respectively, both being elected to a fourth nonconsecutive term.
The election was held during the suspension of the outgoing Teodoro administration. The campaign period was defined by fierce competition between the two coalitions. Major local issues throughout the contest included the local debt and support for the local shoe industry. Allegations of vote buying through the misuse of welfare programs were rife throughout the campaign, as well as the proliferation of disinformation.